What are Power and Ethics? Which One Do You Value?

I remember first encountering Niccolò Machiavelli’s “The Prince.” It was during a college political philosophy class. As I delved into its pages, a startling realization dawned on me: the strategies and themes Machiavelli discussed mirrored the very foundations and actions of the political climate I had studied for years and all the politicians I’ve known growing up. This alignment seemed too precise to be coincidental, sparking a thought – was “The Prince” a satire, a cleverly veiled critique of political ruthlessness? Or was it a guidebook for the creation of our current political climate?

Machiavelli’s The Prince

Niccolò Machiavelli, an Italian Renaissance diplomat, political philosopher, and writer, is best known for his work “The Prince” (Il Principe), written in 1513. His philosophy, often described as Machiavellianism, is marked by a “pragmatic,” sometimes considered cynical, approach to power politics.

The Prince: This work is a guide on how to acquire and maintain political power. Contrary to earlier political theorists’ “idealistic and moralistic” approaches, Machiavelli focused on “realistic” strategies for leaders to gain and retain control. The key themes include:

1. The Centrality of Power: Machiavelli believed that the primary goal of a leader is to maintain power and ensure the stability and strength of their state.
   
2. The End Justifies the Means: He is often associated with the idea that moral considerations can be sidelined if they interfere with political necessity. This includes using deceit, manipulation, and brute force when necessary.
   
3. Fortuna and Virtù: Machiavelli emphasized the role of fortune (Fortuna) in human affairs and the need for a leader to have virtù (a set of qualities including wisdom, strength, courage, and decisiveness) to navigate these uncertainties effectively.
   
4. Realpolitik: His approach is an early form of realpolitik, advocating a realistic view of politics, where the focus is on practicality and power rather than ideals or ethical considerations.

In summary, Machiavelli’s work and philosophy reflect a sharp break from what some people called “idealistic” political theories of the past, focusing instead on practical strategies for acquiring and exercising power. His views have remained influential and controversial, sparking debates about the role of ethics in politics and the true nature of “effective leadership.”

Machiavelli’s Strategies in Today’s World

Machiavelli recommended several strategies for rulers, including fostering division to prevent alliances against them, employing deception and manipulation, maintaining a balance of fear and admiration, utilizing brute force when necessary, and manipulating public opinion.

Machiavelli’s strategies, such as fostering division across religions, classes, genders, and abilities and using threats and media manipulation, are eerily present in modern governance. They serve as tools to maintain control, often at the cost of ethical actions or the consequences their actions have on other people.

The Satirical Debate and Its Modern Implications

Some theories suggest that Machiavelli might have intended “The Prince” as a satirical piece, highlighting the absurdity and inhumanity of sidelining ethics for power. Yet, history has shown that many have used it as a blueprint for governance, particularly in the formation of new nations, including the United States. This approach provided a convenient excuse to discard ethical concerns under the guise of maintaining power, employing deceit, manipulation, and brute force as necessary tools.

The Global Spread of a Machiavellian Government

Today, we observe the expansive influence of a style of governance deeply rooted in Machiavellian principles. Originating from the doctrine of “manifest destiny” championed by the U.S., this paradigm has proliferated globally, molding prevailing perceptions of what constitutes a “democracy.”

Often, this model is wielded as a pretext for justifying military interventions and colonial endeavors, cloaked under the guise of fostering stable democracies. It predominantly targets communities and nations that oppose such control, resisting the manipulative tactics political leaders employ to consolidate their power at all costs.

Power vs. Ethics: A Perpetual Dilemma

This brings us to a crucial question: Is the pursuit of power more important than ethical conduct? Do politicians exhibit true virtues like wisdom, strength, courage, and decisiveness? How can they justify claiming to have those virtues while at the same time using unethical methods to hold power over others?

Rethinking “Democracy” and Power

The current global political landscape, deeply influenced by these Machiavellian principles, calls for a critical reassessment. The pursuit of power, often placed above ethical considerations, has led to a distorted and grim political climate. It raises the question: Are they missing the true essence of ethical values in their relentless quest for power and control?

As we reflect on Machiavelli’s enduring impact, it’s crucial to question and challenge the underlying assumptions of power, ethics, and governance that continue to shape our world.

Power vs. Ethics: The Core Debate

The core concepts at play here are power and ethics. Power, in a political sense, refers to the ability to influence or outright control the behavior of people and the course of events. It’s often seen as a necessary aspect of “leadership and governance.” Ethics, on the other hand, deals with moral principles that govern a person’s behavior. It’s about doing what is right and just.

A total disregard for ethics and humanity in the pursuit of power can lead to detrimental outcomes.

Rethinking Our Definitions of Power and Ethics

Our current political landscape often prioritizes power over ethics. This pursuit of power, marked by division, deception, and manipulation, doesn’t benefit anyone but a very small group of people in the world. Challenging our definitions of power and ethics is crucial. The notion that “this is just the way humans are,” asks us to sideline our ethical considerations for the sake of retaining power and it needs reevaluation.

Claims For The Necessity of Power

Power and its pursuit in politics have been historically viewed as necessary for several reasons:

1. Governance and Order: A claim that power is fundamental to establishing and maintaining governance structures. It’s said that it enables the enforcement of laws and policies, ensuring societal order and stability.
2. Leadership and Decision-Making: In the current political structure, leadership requires making and implementing decisions, often in complex and challenging situations. There is a claim that power gives leaders the authority and capacity to do so.
3. Resource Allocation: The distribution of resources, a key aspect of governance, is said to require power. This government structure claims that power allows for prioritizing and allocating resources to various societal sectors and groups.
4. Defense and Security: The founders of this government claim that maintaining security and defense against internal and external threats requires power. It is said to be necessary to organize and manage defense forces and strategies.

Michel Foucault’s View on Power and Governance

Michel Foucault, a French philosopher and social theorist, had a nuanced view of power and governance. His perspective can be summarized as follows:

• Ubiquity of Power: Foucault argued that power is everywhere and comes from everywhere. It’s not just concentrated in the hands of a few (like in government or elite classes) but is dispersed throughout society.
• Power-Knowledge Relationship: He emphasized the link between power and knowledge, stating that knowledge is used to exert power, and power, in turn, shapes what is accepted as knowledge.
• Disciplinary Power: Foucault introduced the concept of disciplinary power, explaining how social control is exercised through institutions like prisons, schools, and hospitals, which discipline and normalize behavior.
• Resistance: Importantly, Foucault believed that where there is power, there is resistance. He saw power relations as dynamic, with the possibility of change coming from various points within the network of power.

Alternatives to the Traditional Pursuit of Power

Rethinking the traditional pursuit of power in politics leads to exploring alternative models of governance:

1. Participatory Governance: This model emphasizes the direct participation of citizens in decision-making processes, reducing the concentration of power in the hands of a few leaders or representatives.
2. Consensus-Based Decision-Making: Instead of top-down decision-making, consensus models aim for agreement and cooperation among all stakeholders, valuing collective wisdom over hierarchical authority.
3. Distributed Leadership: This approach disperses power among various actors or groups, promoting collaborative leadership and shared responsibility.
4. Empowerment of Local Communities: Focusing on local governance and community-based decision-making can decentralize power, making it more accessible and relevant to the people it affects.

The Harsh Realities of Power-Centric Politics

In our quest to understand the political climate shaped by the relentless pursuit of power, we must confront the harsh consequences of such a system. The prioritization of power by any means, especially unethical ones, has led to some of the darkest chapters in human history. Genocides that erased entire civilizations, widespread poverty and famine, the creation of slavery, and the establishment of prisons and systems akin to slavery – these are but a few examples of the devastating impacts. These actions, often justified under the banner of maintaining or expanding power, have cost millions of innocent lives and inflicted irreparable damage on our planet and its diverse forms of life.

Questioning the Status Quo: Power at What Cost?

It is imperative for us to critically question our relationship with the current political philosophy that prioritizes power above all else. The pursuit of power, when placed on a pedestal, eclipses the fundamental values of ethics and humanity. Can we continue to endorse a system where leaders climb to power on a ladder built from the ruins of ethical principles and human dignity? The cost of such a pursuit is not just a loss of lives but a degradation of our moral compass.

Envisioning a New Way of Coexistence

Imagine a world where governance and community life are not dictated by the hoarding of power in the hands of a few. A world where political ascent does not necessitate the commission of unethical atrocities. We must dare to envision and work towards communities that reflect our ethics and values, where the pursuit is not for power, but for the greater good of all. Communities where integrity and the well-being of every individual are at the forefront.

Such a vision requires us to rethink our definitions of power and leadership. It calls for a shift from a top-down approach to a more inclusive, participatory style of governance. We can draw inspiration from models like participatory governance, consensus-based decision-making, distributed leadership, and the empowerment of local communities. These approaches offer a path towards a society where power is not concentrated in the hands of the few, but is distributed and exercised for the collective benefit.

How To Move Forward

As we challenge our notions of power and leadership, we open the door to a future where political structures are not only just and fair but also compassionate and inclusive.

The lessons from Machiavelli’s “The Prince” and the current state of global politics compel us to think deeply about the kind of world we want to live in. It’s time to move beyond the Machiavellian doctrine of power at any cost and embrace a new paradigm that places ethics, humanity, and integrity at its core. Only then can we build a world that aligns with our deepest values and aspirations for a just, equitable, and thriving society.

Next Steps

I encourage you to delve into Machiavelli’s “The Prince” and closely examine the tactics outlined for gaining and sustaining political power. Reflect on these strategies: Are they justifiable? Do they bring any real benefits to you or those in your community? Following this, deepen your understanding of the concepts of power and ethics. Imagine and contemplate a society where ethical principles and virtues are not just ideals, but are actively embodied in our daily lives and within our communities.

Read more about what it means to live with integrity in my previous blog post: What Does Integrity Mean? How To Do Personal Integrity Checks

Read The Prince for free HERE

Talk to or listen to journalists in Gaza reporting the atrocities that are taking place there and help support these communities by showing the world their message and donating what you can.

Neso’s Channel HERE

Ahmed’s Channel HERE

Mohammed’s Channel HERE